What happens when I submit my application for review?
Please see the flowchart on the Overview of the ethics review process.
Download the flowchart here >
Your application will receive one for four outcomes:
- Approved – no amendments changes to the application form or study documentation required.
- Conditionally Approved: Studies which require relatively minor small changes amendments to the application and/or study documentation. Does not need to be returned for review.
- Change Request: Studies which require more substantial changes amendments to the application and/or study documentation. To be returned to the review.
- Not Approved – for studies which are ethically unsound or submitted in error.
The applicant will be informed via email of the outcome of review (to their University of Sussex email address). They will receive a summary of the feedback and an itemised list of changes required for approval as well as those recommended for the enhancement of the study.If you would like to discuss your research before submitting your application, please email SEMFRECBSMS@sussex.ac.uk.
Undergraduates/Postgraduate taught students
Low-risk applications will be reviewed at school level by your supervisor and School Research Ethics Officer (SREO). Applications will first be authorised by your supervisor and then reviewed an SREO. All applications should be submitted on Ethics RM (Infonetica).
High-risk applications will be reviewed by your supervisor an SREO for your school, plus one F-REC member and any relevant specialists. These may take longer to review, so students who are undertaking high-risk projects should ensure that they are submitted in good time.
All students should discuss their project, methods, and ethical issues with their supervisor in the first instance.
Postgraduate and staff researchers
Applications to SEM: BSMS will be reviewed via one of two pathways. Applications considered to be of lower complexity are reviewed outside of a scheduled Committee meeting and are reviewed by 1 F-REC member and the chair if they are low risk, and 2 F-REC members, the chair/deputy chair and any specialists if they are high risk. Please see the ethics policy for further details.
Those considered to be of higher complexity will continue to be reviewed at a meeting. Applications will be triaged on submission to determine which pathway they will follow. Applicants will be notified if their application will be reviewed at a meeting.